[Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq as master to bind as slave

Eric S. Johansson esj at harvee.org
Fri Jan 20 16:26:30 GMT 2006

Richard Bailey wrote:
> However, now that I think about it, if IPCop has the option for a 
> secondary DNS there should be some way to set one up, or the option 
> should be removed...

that's a secondary name server as in part of the search list.  You could 
set your secondary name server to refer to your internal name server if 
you do not want IPCop to hold your names for your local domain. (at 
least that's how I remember it was set up)


More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list