[Dnsmasq-discuss] feature requests...
bod at bod.org
Sun Apr 1 07:03:11 BST 2007
One of the things I value about dnsmasq is that its simplicity,
performance and small footprint. While dnsmasq could be extended handle
the complex situation you've described, I worry that some of those
desirable qualities would be eroded in making it do so.
Have you already evaluateed and rejected alternative approaches? I think
I'd learn something from hearing your comparison, if you're prepared to
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos Carvalho
> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 8:05 AM
> To: dnsmasq discussion list
> Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] feature requests...
> Since it seems Simon is including new features I'll ask for
> my two pet ones :-)
> I'd like to be able to specify separate interface lists for
> dns and dhcp services. I have tens of subnets where I don't
> need dns, just dhcp, and I'd like to not have a dns server
> in them.
> The second feature is the possibility of specifying a
> different hosts file for each subnet. With a single file all
> names in all subnets are available to each machine, which is
> generating noise even though traffic is blocked. This could
> be avoided if it were possible to tell dnsmasq only the hosts
> allowed in each subnet.
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss