[Dnsmasq-discuss] Source modification for known suffixes
jima at beer.tclug.org
Thu Jan 3 14:30:28 GMT 2008
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, Simon Kelley wrote:
> For interest and completeness sake, SRV records (RFC 2782) do contain
> port numbers. They're a great idea in theory, but very few people
> use/support them, and they're not likely to be the solution for the OP.
That is completely true; I readily admit I was glossing over that very
fine point (mainly because I have zero experience with SRV records).
Thanks for keeping me honest. ;-)
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss