simon at thekelleys.org.uk
Fri May 28 10:14:43 BST 2010
clemens fischer wrote:
> Simon Kelley wrote:
>> Binding 192.168.3.1:67 means that packets from unconfigured hosts
>> which are sent to 255.255.255.255:67 have problems on some platforms.
> That explains it. In my setup on linux, the interface has IP
> 192.168.3.1/28, broadcast 192.168.3.15. I never thought about testing
> this: would a broadcast to 255.255.255.255 somehow sideline a dnsmasq
> listening on 192.168.3.1:67?
It's many years since I did this, but I recall there were such problems
on some platforms.
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss