[Dnsmasq-discuss] Serving address range on a different subnet than the interface

kfriedman at syncadence.com kfriedman at syncadence.com
Sat Jun 26 07:22:45 BST 2010


I get a defautl gateway from upstream say 66.10.20.1.  Your right about the gateway being in teh same subnet, but I'm not sure that the DHCP server has to be the one to inforce it.
 
Thanks,
 
Kirk

-----Original Message-----
From: "richardvoigt at gmail.com" <richardvoigt at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:13pm
To: kfriedman at syncadence.com
Cc: dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Serving address range on a different subnet than the interface

What would you use for a default gateway for these clients? DHCP has
to issue them a default gateway in their own block, otherwise they
can't communicate with the DHCP server to accept the address, and
normally the address of the dnsmasq server is used for this.

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:41 PM, <kfriedman at syncadence.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to emulate a behavior found on dhcpd running on linux 2.6.28
>
> I have an interface eth0 with IP 192.168.13.100/24.
> I want to serve out one or more IPs on a different subnet, say a range of
> 66.10.20.100 to 66.10.20.200 from eth0
> I want to avoid having to burn an 66.10.20.x address by adding it to eth0
> with some "ip addr add"
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> KF
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20100625/063f6a8c/attachment.htm 


More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list