[Dnsmasq-discuss] load balanced dnsmasq?

[Mariano Absatz]

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 21:32, richardvoigt at gmail.com
<richardvoigt at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I think richardvoigt meant to separate the configurations of the DHCP
>> > servers to make them ignore requests they don't have entries for, if
>> > that is possible.
>
> No, that wouldn't be redundant and that's not what I'm suggesting.
> Of course I do suggest an automated solution for pushing configuration
> updates to all the servers from a single source.
Yes... this will happen with a very low frequency or never... I will
manually rsync from a single source at first... If this happens more
than twice, I'll write a little script to do this.

>>
>> Anyway, do you think that configuring static dhcp mac/ip/hostname
>> assignments in a redundant way in the servers and the ip/hostname
>> relationship also in /etc/hosts is a bad thing to do?
>
> It's perfectly fine.  Potential drawbacks are having dynamic leases
> scattered all over or having configs get out of sync.

Excellent. Thanx a lot for your help.

-- 
Mariano Absatz - El Baby
www.clueless.com.ar