[Dnsmasq-discuss] load balancing with interfaces
Hullen at t-online.de
Wed Apr 11 15:59:00 BST 2012
Du meintest am 11.04.12:
>> Changing the "range" definitions to
>> also doesn't work as expected.
>> Users who use a schoolish client with (p.e.)
>> get a DHCP address from the eth1 range, p.e. 192.168.21.22
>> What goes wrong?
> If the client is physically connected to eth1, it will get an address
> which is usable on that network. Your static range will only be
> given out to client physically connected to eth0, because you've
> configured it that way.
Ok - I'll ask the colleague how he has connected the clients. Thank you!
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss