[Dnsmasq-discuss] Enable HAVE_IPSET by default
Vladislav Grishenko
themiron at mail.ru
Thu Mar 21 17:41:16 GMT 2013
Hi Simon,
Here's output from bloat-o-meter (busybox's one) after enabling HAVE_IPSET
on mips32 platform
The growth is ~2Kb, I guess it's ok to have it enabled by default for bb,
but please, insist on not to drop HAVE_IPSET define.
At least, not the all kernels jave it patched/builtin.
function old new delta
add_to_ipset - 832 +832
one_opt 25184 25600 +416
ipset_init - 392 +392
process_reply 872 1104 +232
extract_addresses 2340 2464 +124
main 6840 6872 +32
.rodata 25440 25472 +32
snl - 12 +12
old_kernel - 4 +4
ipset_sock - 4 +4
buffer - 4 +4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
(add/remove: 6/0 grow/shrink: 5/0 up/down: 2084/0) Total: 2084
bytes
Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dnsmasq-discuss-bounces at lists.thekelleys.org.uk [mailto:dnsmasq-
> discuss-bounces at lists.thekelleys.org.uk] On Behalf Of Simon Kelley
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:09 PM
> To: dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Enable HAVE_IPSET by default
>
> On 21/03/13 15:05, sven falempin wrote:
>
> >
> > DNSMASQ also run on system like FreeBSD, do not assume a linux kernel
> > -_- you could also have a cygwin port one day.
> >
> > You want IPSET ? you turn it on.
> > Imagine if everyone want his very own favorite feature set by default !
>
>
> That's true, but not relevant. IPSET gets turned off automatically in
non-linux
> builds, and it's not proposed to change that.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simon.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> <mailto:Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk>
Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss>
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20130321/a2124322/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list