[Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 constructor option - confused!

Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant kevin at darbyshire-bryant.me.uk
Thu May 2 13:36:16 BST 2013


On 02/05/2013 13:09, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
>
> Ahhh!  Right, a clue:  Changing
>
> enable-ra
> dhcp-range=tag:br0,::100, ::FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF, constructor:br0,
> ra-names, 12h
>
> to
>
> enable-ra
> dhcp-range=::100, ::FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF, constructor:br0, ra-names, 12h
>
> makes it work as expected.

Oooops, ignore that.  No it doesn't.  Forgotten I'd changed the LAN IP
address to ::100 to test something else. Doh!

Kevin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20130502/95088350/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3768 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20130502/95088350/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list