[Dnsmasq-discuss] Anyone using authoritative to feed secondary name servers?
dnsmasq at cdl.asgaard.org
Tue Oct 22 08:03:00 BST 2013
On 21 Oct 2013, at 23:51, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 22/10/13 06:22, dnsmasq at cdl.asgaard.org wrote:
>> I am trying to stand up dnsmasq at home, and my secondaries don't
>> seem to be able to pull the serial number of the primary from
>> I'm including the only log messages I am getting, and the snipits
>> the config…
>> Oct 22 05:09:39 heimdal dnsmasq: auth[SOA] dom.asgaard.org
>> Oct 22 05:09:39 heimdal dnsmasq: auth dom.asgaard.org is <SOA>
>> auth-zone=dom.asgaard.org,<my dnsmasq primary block>/24
>> auth-zone=<the reverse zone>.in-addr.arpa,<my dnsmasq primary
>> I've tried it with and without the soa defined. Any thoughts? Sorry
>> this was covered, but I couldn't find an answer after some
>> google searching.
> Ignore previous reply, I was confused with auth-peers.
I had actually already tried that, both IP addresses and domain names -
same effect. Should I also put them in the peers list (according to the
docs, auth-sec-servers is a superset of auth-peers)?
> There's no support in dnsmasq for putting the in-addr.arpa reverse
> zone on the secondaries, so that second auth-zone statement may be the
> cause of the problem.
I've tried it with and without - same effect. BTW - is there a way of
getting the secondaries loaded with the in-addr.arpa (and ipv6.arpa)?
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Check my PGP key here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.asc
Current vCard here: http://www.asgaard.org/cdl/cdl.vcf
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss