[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dnsmasq-2.68 vs. dnsmasq-2.69rc1 Coverity scan diff
dave.taht at gmail.com
Tue Mar 25 15:50:04 UTC 2014
did you also compile with dhcpv6 support enabled?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Tomas Hozza <thozza at redhat.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 24/03/14 13:51, Tomas Hozza wrote:
>> > Hi.
>> > I did a version diff scan between 2.68 and 2.69rc1 version.
>> >>From my point of view there is one thing worth of fixing,
>> > I'm attaching the patch.
>> > I'm also attaching the coverity scan log.
>> > Regards,
>> > Tomas Hozza
>> Thanks, I agree there's a problem if recvfrom() fails and returns -1.
>> The solution is to get the sanity checks right, since is already checks
>> that n < sizeof(struct dns_header), just too late. I've committed a fix:
> Looks reasonable, too.
> Hi Simon.
> Unfortunately I noticed, that I didn't enabled the new DNSSEC functionality
> during the Coverity scan :) I did the scan again and found more issues worth
> of fixing.
> Please see the attached log and patches.
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss