[Dnsmasq-discuss] [Cerowrt-devel] Problems with DNSsec on Comcast, with Cero 3.10.38-1/DNSmasq 4-26-2014
andersk at mit.edu
Fri Oct 3 22:35:08 BST 2014
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 05:28:35 -0400, Anders Kaseorg said:
> > This bottom-up algorithm also seems to have a security problem that’s
> > just as bad as one with the top-down algorithm that you rejected
> > below. Consider the same department.campus.university.edu example,
> > where campus and edu are signed zones, and university is not a zone.
> This issue is why trust anchors were devised so people could start
> deploying DNSSEC before stuff like .COM got signed.
No, you’re misreading. Trust anchors address the case where
campus.university.edu is a signed zone and university.edu is an unzigned
zone. We’re talking about the case where university.edu is not a zone at
all, so that campus.university.edu is served directly from the edu zone.
Obviously this won’t happen at the real edu zone, but real examples exist:
env.state.ma.us, state.ma.us, us are signed zones, and ma.us is not a
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss