[Dnsmasq-discuss] How does DNSMASQ handle large concurrent configure file updating request requests

[Yongkang You]

Hi Simon,

Can you tell me if `dhcp_release eth1 ip mac` is still needed after send
SIGHUP, or why `dhcp_release eth1 ip mac` can't release the binding without
send SIGHUP?

BTW, I am not using openstack. Sorry for the confusion.

Thanks,
Yongkang

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Yongkang You <yongkang.you at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Simon Kelley <simon at thekelleys.org.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> The current code doesn't do anything when a file is deleted. To make
>> that have an affect, you're back to sending SIGHUP to clean out the
>> data and re-read the current set of files.
>>
>
> Okay.
>
>
>>
>> I'm pretty sure I mentioned that way back.
>>
>> If deleting lots of VMs one-at-time is something that will happen,
>> then we need to look at solving that, but my impressiion is that it's
>> not something openstack does often? Am I wrong?
>>
>
> I don't know if openstack does that or not. If that's the right solution,
> I will follow it. Anyway, thanks for the inotify feature. It is great!
>
>
> --
> Yongkang You
>



-- 
Yongkang You
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20150216/09cf56c9/attachment.html>