[Dnsmasq-discuss] Unseen cache limit?

[wkitty42 at gmail.com]

On 06/03/2015 05:41 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> That number isn't magic: it's the largest I tested and the the largest
> that seemed sensible. If there's evidence that larger cache sizes make
> sense, it could be raised.

FWIW: as long as the purging of timedout domains is working properly, i don't 
know of any real reason why it cannot me increased or even removed if there's 
enough memory on the moochine to handle it...

yes, this is my first post but i've been reading for a while... mainly due to 
the possibility of changing ""our"" distribution from the ICS thing to this one 
for better DHCP and DNS interaction (eg: some box joins and the DNS is 
automatically updated to include it)... i won't mention this distribution at 
this time but it is a FOSS security device implementation...

thanks for your time and consideration! ;)

-- 
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
       Please keep mailing list traffic on the list unless
       private contact is specifically requested and granted.