[Dnsmasq-discuss] Making dnsmasq make OFFER faster than virtualbox NAT DHCP

Simon Kelley simon at thekelleys.org.uk
Mon Jan 23 11:49:39 GMT 2017


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Actually, it's permitted to have more than once DHCP server, but the
client is entitled to wait for some time to hear from them all, and
then pick whichever one it prefers, so trying to implement server
priority by speed-of-reply is doomed to failure.


Cheers,

Simon.


On 23/01/17 01:54, wkitty42 at gmail.com wrote:
> On 01/22/2017 08:02 PM, Sebastian Tarach wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I'm trying to make *dnsmasq* work on my Debian Virtualbox guest
>> but I keep getting reply from my VBox host DHCP first.
> 
> there should only ever be one DHCP server running on any net
> segments... turn off or otherwise disable all the others and you
> should see the results you desire...
> 
> FWIW: rogue DHCP servers are the bane of sysdamins everywhere...
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=pZLP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list