[Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq socket file disappearing

Zi Dvbelju zidvbelju at gmail.com
Tue Feb 6 20:42:37 GMT 2018


Hey Simon,

In my previous email, "Healthy Node" and "Failed Node" are two entirely
different servers, completely independent in each other (which explains why
they have different IP addresses).

Sorry - I should have made that clearer! Just wanted to illustrate the
difference in output between a known working server and a failed server.
Your thought process did spark my interest in DHCP logs; however, the IP
address has been consistent throughout the issues.

Thanks,
Zach

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Simon Kelley <simon at thekelleys.org.uk>
wrote:

> On 05/02/18 15:43, Zi Dvbelju wrote:
>
> > Healthy Node (netstat)
> > ```
> > *udp        0      0 127.0.0.1:53 <http://127.0.0.1:53>
> > 0.0.0.0:*                           1400/dnsmasq*
> > *udp        0      0 10.3.1.79:53 <http://10.3.1.79:53>
> > 0.0.0.0:*                           1400/dnsmasq*
> > *udp        0      0 172.17.0.1:53 <http://172.17.0.1:53>
> >  0.0.0.0:*                           1400/dnsmasq*
>
> > /var/log/syslog.7:2018-02-05T06:05:31.066648+00:00 dnsmasq[1359]: failed
> > to create listening socket for 172.17.0.1 <http://172.17.0.1>: Address
> > already in use
> > /var/log/syslog.7:2018-02-05T06:05:31.066813+00:00 dnsmasq[1359]: failed
> > to create listening socket for 10.3.4.228 <http://10.3.4.228>: Address
> > already in use
> > /var/log/syslog.7:2018-02-05T06:05:31.066917+00:00 dnsmasq[1359]: failed
> > to create listening socket for 127.0.0.1 <http://127.0.0.1>: Address
> > already in use
> > ```
> >
>
> Further to my previous question, I can see that the dnsmasq _was_
> listening in  127.0.0.1, 172.17.0.1 and 10.3.1.79, and then it attempts
> to listen on  127.0.0.1, 172.17.0.1 and 10.3.4.228, so that implies a
> network configuration change, with something changing 10.3.1.79 ->
> 10.3.4.228. Any idea what that's about? If you can find what causes that
> change, we might, at very least, have a way to reproduce this at will.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simon.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20180206/a086e25b/attachment.html>


More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list