[Dnsmasq-discuss] Struggling with multiple nameservers
stappers at stappers.nl
Mon Jan 13 21:03:44 GMT 2020
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 10:20:40PM +0000, Harry Moyes wrote:
> On 12/01/2020 15:40, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:33:43PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 04:37:32PM +0000, Harry Moyes wrote:
> > > > > ....
> > > >
> > > > I've already mentioned this to the developers.
> > >
> > > Any prove of that?
> > >
> > >
> > > > The change is apparently intentional.
> > > Assumed or documented?
> > >
> > My questions from above are indeed terse.
> > Let me elaborate
> > |> > I've already mentioned this to the developers.
> > |>
> > |> Any prove of that?
> > That question was written in the hope of getting an URL or email
> > where can be read what was mentioned to the pihole developers.
> > I still hope such email or URL pops up. The idea is to ask,
> > differently as previously, to regain the lost functionality.
> Unless it has gone missing somewhere I have already replied to the question.
> I misunderstood the response I got from the pihole-FTL developers.
> pihole-FTL -v does not respond as dnsmasq does. Intentionally.
> However if you submit the request as
> pihole-FTL -- -v
> you get exactly the same response as from dnsmasq including the compiled
> The subtly of the extra "--" passed me by initially.
> As I said in my previous post, if I had understood the reply I got better,
> I'd have saved myself a load of pain.
> Other than possibly making that subtlety more obvious to the slower on the
> uptake among us, like me, there is nothing else required here.
Yes, the right question is real challenge
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss