<div dir="ltr">dnsmasq, like most things, was better back in the eleventh century...<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:14 PM, xerces8 <<a href="mailto:xerces8@butn.net">xerces8@butn.net</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">Simon Kelley wrote:<br>
<br>
> xerces8 wrote:<br>
> > Simon Kelley wrote :<br>
> ><br>
> >> I'm removing the 2.44 tarball from the website to avoid confusion.<br>
> ><br>
> > To avoid even more confusion, I suggest putting there a file named<br>
> > dnsmasq-2.43-REMOVED.txt with a content of few statements explaining<br>
> > the above.<br>
> ><br>
> Good suggestion. Done,<br>
<br>
</div>Spot the error :<br>
<br>
Simon Kelley<br>
21/07/1008<br>
<br>
:-D<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk">Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>