I agree completely with this. I currently use dnsmasq with a samba 3 domain and do not want to have to abandon dnsmasq to utilize samba 4.<div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br clear="all">Mike E.</div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Helmut Hullen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Hullen@t-online.de">Hullen@t-online.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hallo,<br>
<br>
in the samba mailinglist there was a remark that samba 4 is designed<br>
only for the BIND nameserver; look escpecially at<br>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2011-February/160848.html" target="_blank">http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2011-February/160848.html</a><br>
<br>
I know that most programmers work in their "free" time (me too). But I<br>
don't like working with the ISC DNS, and I'd like working with "dnsmasq"<br>
under samba 4 too.<br>
<br>
Viele Gruesse!<br>
Helmut<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk">Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>