<html><head><style data-externalstyle="true"><!--
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph {
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
}
p.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, p.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, p.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast {
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
line-height:115%;
}
--></style></head><body><div data-externalstyle="false" dir="ltr" style="font-family:Calibri,'Segoe UI',Meiryo,'Microsoft YaHei UI','Microsoft JhengHei UI','Malgun Gothic','Khmer UI','Nirmala UI',Tunga,'Lao UI',Ebrima,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><div> </div><div>I get an “dnsmasq: bad dhcp-range at line 8 of /etc/dnsmasq.conf” error on </div><div> </div><div>dhcp-range=172.16.0.1,172.16.0.254,static</div><div> </div><div>or dhcp-range=172.16.0.0,172.16.0.255,static</div><div> </div><div>but I understand for obsolete legacy reasons dnsmasq doesn’t issue .255 addresses</div><div> </div><div>But what is wrong with the first range? It did work fine with older version of dnsmasq. I couldn’t find anything in the release notes, but I probably looked at the wrong places</div></div></body></html>