[Dnsmasq-discuss] Problems using 'split horizon' approach
Dave Ewart
davee at ceu.ox.ac.uk
Mon Aug 15 11:11:44 BST 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, 04.08.2005 at 17:35 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> >>The workaround is to add the CNAME to /etc/hosts on the dnsmasq machine,
> >>so that it gets answered locally.
> >
> >Well, I don't *think* that's happening, since there are no
> >publically-defined CNAMEs which don't also exist in /etc/hosts.
>
> In that case I'm bewildered.
Hmm, a thought.
The host in question is a mail host and the MX record refers to the
*public* IP address, not the private IP range address. Maybe something
is doing an MX lookup on the local network and the dnsmasq server is
returning the external IP address. Can I set an MX
record via dnsmasq?!?
Dave.
- --
Dave Ewart
davee at ceu.ox.ac.uk
Computing Manager, Cancer Epidemiology Unit
Cancer Research UK / Oxford University
PGP: CC70 1883 BD92 E665 B840 118B 6E94 2CFD 694D E370
N 51.7518, W 1.2016
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDAGpgbpQs/WlN43ARAoADAJ450jVF+y0QN2LVM2Ff6LV8/Y4XZgCdGfQD
CVDHSjFpq3z7kAFTL6nXqZw=
=WbSB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list