[Dnsmasq-discuss] wrong response code for no SRV record

/dev/rob0 rob0 at gmx.co.uk
Tue May 4 16:47:37 BST 2010


On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:29:27PM +0530, Rahul Amaram wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your response. Please find my responses inline. 
> Btw, your last suggestion has helped me achieve the desired result

That's good, glad to hear it.

> though I still feel it would be great to have dnsmasq return 
> NXDOMAIN only for a particular domain and forward the remainig 
> domain queries to upstream servers. For example, dnsmasq should be 
> configurable such that query for _kerberos-master._udp.example.com 
> is returned as NXDOMAIN where as queries for 
> _kerberos._udp.example.com and _kpasswd._udp.example.com are 
> forwarded to upstream server.

Something like
    address=/_kerberos-master._udp.example.com/nxdomain

Actually I think this would work, but I'm not able to try it now:
    local=/_kerberos-master._udp.example.com/
With no listings in /etc/hosts that should return NXDOMAIN, not 
consulting upstream servers.

> On Tuesday 04 May 2010 01:43 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > Show what Kerberos is actually looking up. Is it as you said,
> > _kerberos-master.udp.EXAMPLE.COM, or is is perhaps as per the
> > documented LDAP example, "_kerberos-master._udp.EXAMPLE.COM"?
> >    
> I do not understand the difference. If the kerberos realm is 

The difference is the leading underscore on the second segment, 
"._udp." versus ".udp."
-- 
    Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless
    "/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header



More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list