[Dnsmasq-discuss] Feature Request(s)
Rob Zwissler
rob at zwissler.org
Fri Mar 9 19:05:53 GMT 2012
Hi Simon - I'm a big fan of DNSMasq, it's great software, thanks all for
your hard work. I had three requests/questions I just wanted to throw out
there that would come in handy for simplifying configuration in what I
think would be an intuitive way. For the most part, this is related to
consolidating DNSMasq implementations into a single config file and
extending cmd line syntax to reduce reliance on external files. I really
like the self contained simple nature of DNSMasq and I won't be happy until
it's as powerful and cryptic as Perl ;)
1) address=/domain/ip works great as described, but *.domain and *.*.domain
(etc...) also resolv based on this syntax. Syntax like address=/.domain/ip
that would prevent *.domain from resolving, or address=/..domain/ip would
prevent *.*.domain but allow *.domain, something in that vain, would come
in handy. That way, single A records could be overridden with
address=/.host/ip so I could keep everything in a single dnsmasq.conf file
without maintaining a separate addn-hosts file. Seems like this could
extend functionality in a very intuitive, backwards-compatible way without
adding much messiness to config or documentation.
2) Any reason why an /etc/hosts syntax line can't be put in a dnsmasq.conf
file? As far as I can tell it wouldn't break the dnsmasq syntax, and it
would allow for consolidating files in a very intuitive, minimalist way.
3) If #1 & #2 aren't feasible, how about something like a=host,ip that
would allow for an A/PTR pair in more traditional dnsmasq.conf style
syntax, to reduce the need for an addn-hosts file.
4) How come cname= only works for local hosts? Would that be difficult to
implement so you could create CNAMEs for A records hosted on upstream
servers?
regards,
Rob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20120309/ee7a17e4/attachment.html>
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list