[Dnsmasq-discuss] Removing a feature does anyone rely on this?
Helmut Hullen
Hullen at t-online.de
Mon Jul 2 17:16:00 BST 2012
Hallo, Simon,
Du meintest am 02.07.12:
>>> dhcp-range may have an interface name supplied as
>>> "interface:<interface-
>> name>> ".
>> I'd like to use this feature in many schools:
>>
>> eth0 and eth1 for the school clients in the LAN, eth2 for the
>> private clients (especially in the WLAN). And eth3 for DSL/Router
>> into the WAN.
[...]
> Note that you don't need to tell dnsmasq which dhcp-range goes with
> which interface - it finds that automatically using the IP address
> and netmask of the interfaces.
May be.
But our experiments failed.
We wanted
dhcp-range=192.168.0.10,static,infinite
# (192.168.0.0/24) for the school computers
dhcp-range=192.168.18.10,192.168.31.250,30d
# (192.168.16.0/20) for the private machines
and defined all school computers via "dhcp-host=...".
Sometimes/often they got IP adresses from the "private" net.
Adding/changing
dhcp-range=eth0,...
dhcp-range=eth1,...
didn't help.
There is a third NIC for the DSL/Router, defined as
no-dhcp-interface=eth2
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list