[Dnsmasq-discuss] host resolved local and remote records too

[Papp Tamas]

On 01/18/2013 05:15 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
> There is a documented limitation of dnsmasq that it doesn't support CNAMES where the target of the
> CNAME is not known by dnsmasq. Is that what's causing the problem?

I expect, that dnsmasq even doesn't meet with the CNAME.

I think the normal behaviour would be that if it's able to resolve the hostname locally, then it 
stops following the chain to the uptream dns server.

tamas