[Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 constructor option - confused!

Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant kevin at darbyshire-bryant.me.uk
Thu May 2 13:09:16 BST 2013

On 02/05/2013 13:02, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> Specifying the router's LAN IPv6 address as the start of the range was
> not how I anticipated this option to work. And I don't think you do
> either based upon your above description. So is this an oversight or
> some tomato based wierdness...either way, how can I help to sort it
> out? Kevin

Ahhh!  Right, a clue:  Changing

dhcp-range=tag:br0,::100, ::FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF, constructor:br0,
ra-names, 12h


dhcp-range=::100, ::FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF, constructor:br0, ra-names, 12h

makes it work as expected.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20130502/54da1917/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3768 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20130502/54da1917/attachment.bin>

More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list