[Dnsmasq-discuss] New DNSSEC test release.

[Simon Kelley]

On 11/02/14 14:16, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
>> Is unbound-anchor fairly stand-alone? Maybe run unbound-anchor and
>> then covert the format of the resulting trust-anchors file would be
>> a viable solution?
>
> Fairly, yes, but: if people can run unbound-anchor they have Unbound, so
> what would be the point of dnsmasq as a validator? ;-)

So unbound-anchor needs unbound? Its not just a wrapper around curl and 
an XML parser? That would indeed scupper my plan :)

Simon.


>
>          -JP
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
>