[Dnsmasq-discuss] Does DNSSEC require nettle and gmp, or nettle with gmp?

Nathan Dorfman na at rtfm.net
Tue Apr 1 18:14:57 UTC 2014


With such superior understanding, shouldn't you be adding OpenSSL support
to dnsmasq yourself? That way you can deal with their byzantine API and the
resulting bugs, and Simon can instead do something actually worthwhile.



On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com> wrote:

> On 01/04/14 2:02 PM, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
>
>> Maybe OpenSSL is the right choice anyway, I don't know. But, I thought
>> someone should speak up for nettle :)
>>
>
> speaking up for nettle means nothing when you don't understand the
> issue at hand.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20140401/7835082f/attachment.html>


More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list