[Dnsmasq-discuss] Does DNSSEC require nettle and gmp, or nettle with gmp?
/dev/rob0
rob0 at gmx.co.uk
Wed Apr 9 13:24:48 UTC 2014
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:54:28AM -0500, I wrote:
^^^^^^
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:08:44PM -0400, Alex Xu wrote:
> > On 25/03/14 07:03 PM, sven falempin wrote:
> > > my concern of nettle vs openssl is the amount of review and
> > > testing nettle did get compared to something more widely(!)
> > > used openssl
> >
> > something being used a lot != something being good
>
> Absolutely true, but in the context of open source software,
> especially cryptographic software, more use also tends to mean
> more code review.
April Fools!
;)
> I'm not really qualified to judge here what is best; I can only
> point out what I, as a user, think about it. I'll trust Simon's
> judgment, but I hope he has considered these concerns.
--
http://rob0.nodns4.us/
Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject:
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list