[Dnsmasq-discuss] Announce: dnsmasq-2.69

[Brad Smith]

On 11/04/14 5:42 AM, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> Good ! But anyway, we still need a resolver.
> Why not considering making dnsmasq acting as resolver itself too ?

It is outside of the scope of what dnsmasq is for.

> Thanks for your work (didn't tried the release, but you deserve some
> congrats...)!


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.