[Dnsmasq-discuss] Thanks and question
Simon Kelley
simon at thekelleys.org.uk
Mon Feb 9 11:40:21 GMT 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
You can think of a dhcp-range statement as supplying two things: a
subnet in which DHCP happens and a range of addresses within that
subnet which can be dynamically allocated to DHCP clients.
It doesn't constrain dhcp-host entries to be within the dynamic range,
only the subnet, so
dhcp-range=192.168.1.100,192.168.1.200,255.255.255
dhcp-host=myhost,192.168.1.80
Is perfectly sensible: unknown hosts go into
192.168.1.100-192.168.1.200 and known hosts go elsewhere where they
can't be interfered with by dynamic allocation, are amenable to
different firewall rules, etc etc.
dhcp-range=192.168.1.0.static,255.255.255.0
Just provides the subnet to enable the relevant dhcp-host entries,
without providing any range for dynamic allocation, so unknown hosts
will fail to get an address.
Cheers,
Simon.
On 08/02/15 03:14, A James Boswell wrote:
> G’day, I only just came across dnsmasq and installed and
> configured it yesterday. It’s great. Thank you.
>
> My question. What is the reasoning behind dhcp-host static entries
> being subnets, not start and end ranges? The syntax on the man
> page suggests start and end addresses should work, though the
> description says subnet. Sure enough a range fails —test.
> Fortunately I was close to a /25 boundary anyway, but is there some
> reason it couldn’t work the other way?
>
> Thanks again - it’s a really well structured, easy to configure
> solution for small networks. One that’s been sorely missing.
>
> A. James Boswell james at boswellbunch.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss
> mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=/+WN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list