[Dnsmasq-discuss] DNAME or domain to domain transltion?

[Dave Taht]

I have renewed hope then.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:

> dname is not dead. it always included a synthesized cname. so a dname in
> the zone file can create an unlimited number of cnames in cache.
>
> re:
>
>   Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
>  Tuesday, March 17, 2015 11:41 AM
> I had had a lot of hope for DNAMEs, but they were shot down in the ietf
> years ago. Vestiges survive in "bind", at least, but I suspect there is
> little application support.
>
> I would not mind an attempt to resurrect them. Naming in the face of being
> renumbered all the time by various ipv4 and ipv6 providers is a real PITA.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!
>
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb
>
>
> --
> Paul Vixie
>



-- 
Dave Täht
Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!

https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20150317/0a573628/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: compose-unknown-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 770 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20150317/0a573628/attachment.jpg>