[Dnsmasq-discuss] seeing www.ietf.org fail dnssec with dnsmasq rc7
Dave Taht
dave.taht at gmail.com
Thu May 7 15:49:25 BST 2015
on a comcast native ipv6 connection, 1232 from OSX (ping6 -s 1232
2001:4860:4860::8888)
On the router *itself* I can't even
ping6 -s 80 2001:4860:4860::8888
PING 2001:4860:4860::8888 (2001:4860:4860::8888): 80 data bytes
^C
--- 2001:4860:4860::8888 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
So i kind of suspected the -s calculation includes headers on one OS
or the other, or, I thought briefly, have a firewall rule in the way,
but weirdly
I can ping6 -s 4000 to snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net from the router
also. This makes no sense whatsoever.
sigh. We have a tool (isoburst) we keep meaning to polish up that
tests udp extensively, I guess we're going to have to add
fragmentation checks to it.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk> wrote:
> Simon Kelley <simon at thekelleys.org.uk> writes:
>
>> Using ping6 2001:4860:4860::8888 -s <packet size>
>>
>> (that's the Google public DNS server)
>>
>> I see answers up to packet size 1344.
>
> I get answers up to -s 1432. This is on an he.net tunnel.
>
> -Toke
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Dave Täht
Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list