[Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq does not cache a authoritative response from upstream ?

Simon Kelley simon at thekelleys.org.uk
Tue Oct 20 19:39:39 BST 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



On 17/10/15 01:59, Carlos Carvalho wrote:

> A non-recursive upstream is of little use. I suggest putting a
> warning in the logs and leaving it as is.

There is already a warning if any upstream server is not recursive.

Simon.

> 
> _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss
> mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk 
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=sOA8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list