[Dnsmasq-discuss] redundant/resiliant dnsmasq servers?
Weedy
weedy2887 at gmail.com
Sat Mar 26 15:06:57 GMT 2016
On 26 Mar 2016 9:50 am, "Chris Green" <cl at isbd.net> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 05:00:17PM -0400, Weedy wrote:
> > On 25 Mar 2016 13:21, "Kurt H Maier" <[1]khm at sciops.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 05:12:52PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > > > Would not it be more useful to supervise and restart the service
in
> > case
> > > > of a crash? Service management is ubiquitous on the major
> > distributions
> > > > these days... and in case the crash isn't due to memory
exhaustion
> > by
> > > > other processes, investigate why it's crashing, and have that
> > fixed?
> > >
> > > Hardware fails.
> > >
> > Considering dhcp typically runs on the router in a home, I think
> > hardware failure would cause you bigger issues then "oh crap I can't
> > even DNS"
> >
> But dnsmasq in general *doesn't* run on a dedicated router, it's
> something that has been installed by a user because the DNS and DHCP
> in the router is too limited.
Uhhhhh, like every Buffalo, d-link, Linksys, netgear, tp-link, etc router
runs dnsmasq.
And of course OpenWrt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20160326/e1df3387/attachment.html>
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list