[Dnsmasq-discuss] Clarify/Improve DNSSEC related SIGHUP handling
Simon Kelley
simon at thekelleys.org.uk
Mon Jul 11 21:05:14 BST 2016
Ah yes, I see the problem. Patch applied. Sorry it took so long :-(
Cheers,
Simon.
On 11/07/16 08:54, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
>
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Please could you consider the attached patch. It solves a problem that
> using dnssec-timestamp also effectively enabled dnssec-no-timecheck.
> The result of which is that an unfortunately timed SIGHUP could
> accidentally enable dnssec timestamp checking. In combination with
> dnssec-check-unsigned that could prove 'challenging' :-)
>
> The patch matches the behaviour as is documented in the manpage.
>
> kind regards,
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
>
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list