[Dnsmasq-discuss] Clarify/Improve DNSSEC related SIGHUP handling

Simon Kelley simon at thekelleys.org.uk
Mon Jul 11 21:05:14 BST 2016


Ah yes, I see the problem. Patch applied. Sorry it took so long :-(

Cheers,

Simon.


On 11/07/16 08:54, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Simon,
> 
> Please could you consider the attached patch.  It solves a problem that
> using dnssec-timestamp also effectively enabled dnssec-no-timecheck.
> The result of which is that an unfortunately timed SIGHUP could
> accidentally enable dnssec timestamp checking.  In combination with
> dnssec-check-unsigned that could prove 'challenging' :-)
> 
> The patch matches the behaviour as is documented in the manpage.
> 
> kind regards,
> 
> Kevin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
> 




More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list