[Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq DHCP behind a DHCP relay, without directly-connected addresses

Simon Kelley simon at thekelleys.org.uk
Fri Aug 12 20:15:31 BST 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



On 12/08/16 01:13, James Brown wrote:
> Since I'm using static addresses, it seems like dnsmasq doesn't
> actually need to know what subnet the client is in, though. Is
> there any possibility of, for static address configuration, just
> trusting the configuration and ignoring giaddr?
> 

No, the DHCP server has to be able to determine which subnet(s) the
client is located on. Apart from anything else, dnsmasq supports
multiple static addresses for a client, and choses the one which is
suitable for the clients current subnet.


What you're trying to do with a DHCP relay is completely standard: it
should be possble to make it work.


Cheers,

Simon.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=2HZW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list