[Dnsmasq-discuss] Sequential IP doesn't look for unused IPs
wkitty42 at gmail.com
wkitty42 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 24 13:02:30 GMT 2016
On 12/23/2016 08:04 PM, Alec Robertson wrote:
> When using sequential IP, the IP allocation should start from the lowest
> available IP address.
this depends on the implementation... some start at the bottom (lowest) and
others start at the top (highest)... where they start does not really matter...
the *nix systems i've worked with all started at the top when allocating IPs to
non-psuedo-static systems... IIRC, winwhatever is the only one i've worked with
that started at the bottom...
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Please keep mailing list traffic on the list* unless
private contact is specifically requested and granted.
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list