[Dnsmasq-discuss] Sequential IP doesn't look for unused IPs

wkitty42 at gmail.com wkitty42 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 24 13:02:30 GMT 2016


On 12/23/2016 08:04 PM, Alec Robertson wrote:
> When using sequential IP, the IP allocation should start from the lowest
> available IP address.

this depends on the implementation... some start at the bottom (lowest) and 
others start at the top (highest)... where they start does not really matter... 
the *nix systems i've worked with all started at the top when allocating IPs to 
non-psuedo-static systems... IIRC, winwhatever is the only one i've worked with 
that started at the bottom...

-- 
  NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
        *Please keep mailing list traffic on the list* unless
        private contact is specifically requested and granted.



More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list