[Dnsmasq-discuss] priority of upstream servers

[Simon Kelley]

In general "don't use --strict-order" is good advice. In hindsight I
would never have provided that option.


Simon.


On 21/02/18 12:43, mehturt at protonmail.com wrote:
> Ah, that's correct! I missed this in the manual.
> Thanks a lot.
> 
> ​-- 
> 
> 
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> ​
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
>  On February 21, 2018 1:19 PM, Simon Kelley <simon at thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:
> 
>> I'll take a guess that you have --strict-order in your config.
>>
>> If so, remove it and all will be well.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Simon.
>>
>>
>> On 21/02/18 08:19, mehturt at protonmail.com wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> is it possible for dnsmasq to prioritize upstream DNS servers based on
>>> their availability?
>>> I have 2 servers in my resolv.conf, first one is not available.
>>> Dnsmasq always contacts the first one, which takes some time, then
>>> contacts the second one.
>>> m.
>>> --
>>> Sent with ProtonMail https://protonmail.com Secure Email.
>>>
>>> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
>>> Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
>>> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
>>>
>>
>> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
>> Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
>> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
>>
> 
>