[Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCP tag being ignored?
Geert Stappers
stappers at stappers.nl
Sat Apr 6 07:28:17 BST 2019
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:43:12PM +0000, Dave Thompson wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am trying to configure Dnsmasq to provide a custom range of IP
> addresses for my VMs which will then map to a certain subdomain. The
> trouble is, the tag is being found (I can see in the log file) but
> the correct IP range is never provided.
>
> Here's my config file:
>
> domain=int.[redacted]
> domain=vm.int.[redacted],192.168.1.50,192.168.1.150
>
> dhcp-range=192.168.0.50,192.168.0.150,12h
> dhcp-range=tag:vms,192.168.1.50,192.168.1.150,12h
So
ccc.ddd.0.nnn and
ccc.ddd.1.nnn
> dhcp-mac=set:vms,08:00:27:*:*:*
>
> dhcp-host=98:E7:F4:BA:3D:AA,192.168.0.80
> dhcp-leasefile=/var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.leases
> dhcp-authoritative
>
> log-dhcp
>
> >From the log:
>
> Apr 5 17:37:39 pi dnsmasq-dhcp[21541]: 3063663390 available DHCP range: 192.168.0.50 -- 192.168.0.150
missing the 192.168.1.50 -- 192.168.1.150 range
> Apr 5 17:37:39 pi dnsmasq-dhcp[21541]: 3063663390 vendor class: MSFT 5.0
> Apr 5 17:37:39 pi dnsmasq-dhcp[21541]: 3063663390 client provides name: DWT-VPC-W7-0
> Apr 5 17:37:39 pi dnsmasq-dhcp[21541]: 3063663390 DHCPINFORM(eth0) 192.168.0.104 08:00:27:ab:8b:7e
eth0 ccc.ddd.0.nnn 08:00:27:*:*:*
> Apr 5 17:37:39 pi dnsmasq-dhcp[21541]: 3063663390 tags: vms, eth0
> Apr 5 17:37:39 pi dnsmasq-dhcp[21541]: 3063663390 DHCPACK(eth0) 192.168.0.104 08:00:27:ab:8b:7e DWT-VPC-W7-0
>
> Can any of you point out what I am missing, please?
Start with changing your
} domain=int.[redacted]
} domain=vm.int.[redacted],192.168.1.50,192.168.1.150
}
} dhcp-range=192.168.0.50,192.168.0.150,12h
} dhcp-range=tag:vms,192.168.1.50,192.168.1.150,12h
into
domain=int.[redacted]
domain=vm.int.[redacted],192.168.0.151,192.168.0.200
dhcp-range=192.168.0.50,192.168.0.150,12h
dhcp-range=tag:vms,192.168.0.151,192.168.0.200,12h
to get
} Dnsmasq to provide a custom range of IP addresses
} for VMs which will then map to a certain subdomain.
So all in ccc.ddd.X.nnn
Extending it to ccc.ddd.A.nnn and ccc.ddd.B.nnn will
take extra effort.
> Thank you very much,
>
> Dave
Looking forward to the report of the success story.
Yes, even little success stories are welcome.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Leven en laten leven
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list