[Dnsmasq-discuss] ubus problem
wkitty42 at gmail.com
wkitty42 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 11 17:27:49 BST 2019
On 4/10/19 12:55 PM, Jan Willem Janssen wrote:
> There's one solution I can think of: making the name under which we register
> the UBus object configurable (with "dnsmasq" as default for backwards
> compatibility). It would allow multiple instances to be configured each with
> their own unique name.
this is exactly what i was thinking of in my post where i mistakenly wrote dbus
instead of ubus...
> We could extend the existing `enable-ubus` flag to allow this name to be
> supplied from the command line/configuration file.
exactly the idea i proposed... what's that saying about like minds thinking in
like manner? ;)
--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
*Please keep mailing list traffic on the list unless*
*a signed and pre-paid contract is in effect with us.*
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list