[Dnsmasq-discuss] ubus problem

wkitty42 at gmail.com wkitty42 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 11 17:27:49 BST 2019


On 4/10/19 12:55 PM, Jan Willem Janssen wrote:
> There's one solution I can think of: making the name under which we register
> the UBus object configurable (with "dnsmasq" as default for backwards
> compatibility). It would allow multiple instances to be configured each with
> their own unique name.

this is exactly what i was thinking of in my post where i mistakenly wrote dbus 
instead of ubus...


> We could extend the existing `enable-ubus` flag to allow this name to be
> supplied from the command line/configuration file.

exactly the idea i proposed... what's that saying about like minds thinking in 
like manner? ;)


-- 
  NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
        *Please keep mailing list traffic on the list unless*
        *a signed and pre-paid contract is in effect with us.*



More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list