[Dnsmasq-discuss] Best way to handle dual-wans with dnsmasq (John Knight)
John.Knight at belkin.com
Mon Aug 26 18:06:39 BST 2019
In my situation with dual-wans, I am not too concerned about management network being accessible to all users, so using a single dnsmasq is acceptable. I am using dnsmasq to serve dhcp and dns requests on the data network, but it only needs to support dns requests on the management network.
What I have tried so far is to add the nameserver entries for both wans to resolv.conf. However, I am seeing dns queries only go to the data wan... they are not going to the management wan. How does dnsmasq know that nameserver xx.xx.xx.xx is on management wan, and nameserver yy.yy.yy.yy is on data wan... and how does dnsmasq know to query both wans for any given dns request? I think what I had hoped is that dnsmasq would first query dns server upstream on the data wan, then if it did not resolve the address, it would then try to query the dns server on the management wan.
I know there is a listen address which I presume is somehow used to in essence route the request to a given wan, but I am not sure. I think what I really need is an example on how to do this.
Thanks for your help with this.
__________________________________________________________________ Confidential This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of Belkin International, Inc. and/or its affiliates, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipients or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Pour la version fran?aise: http://www.belkin.com/email-notice/French.html F?r die deutsche ?bersetzung: http://www.belkin.com/email-notice/German.html __________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss