[Dnsmasq-discuss] inconsistent use of a server=/example.com/<ip_addr> specification

Geert Stappers stappers at stappers.nl
Mon Nov 25 21:44:13 GMT 2019


On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 03:54:47PM -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 20:59 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > 
> > Please confirm that each of the above `dig` commands
> > was **all** done at `host.example.com`
> 
> Yes, of course.

Acknowlegde on confirmation of "all at same host"
 
> } } } cat /etc/resolv.conf
> } } server 127.0.0.1
> > Acknowledge. Please repeat the original test[1] with
> > 
> > dig +short @127.0.0.1 example.com. ns
> > dig +short @127.0.0.1 mail.example.com.
> > dig +short @127.0.0.1 example.com. ns

note twice a query on NS of example.com

 
> # dig +short @127.0.0.1 example.com. ns
> server.example.com.
> # dig +short @127.0.0.1 mail.example.com.
> 9.1.1.18
> # dig +short @127.0.0.1 interlinx.bc.ca. ns

Hey, that one was not in the original post.


> server.example.ca.
> ns1.he.net.
> ns2.he.net.
> ns3.he.net.
> ns4.he.net.
> ns5.he.net.

Acknowledge.


Back to what the original problem is.  (explain what
  inconsistent use of a server=/example.com/<ip_addr> specification
is supposed to mean)


Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
Leven en laten leven



More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list