[Dnsmasq-discuss] inconsistent use of a server=/example.com/<ip_addr> specification
Geert Stappers
stappers at stappers.nl
Mon Nov 25 21:44:13 GMT 2019
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 03:54:47PM -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 20:59 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >
> > Please confirm that each of the above `dig` commands
> > was **all** done at `host.example.com`
>
> Yes, of course.
Acknowlegde on confirmation of "all at same host"
> } } } cat /etc/resolv.conf
> } } server 127.0.0.1
> > Acknowledge. Please repeat the original test[1] with
> >
> > dig +short @127.0.0.1 example.com. ns
> > dig +short @127.0.0.1 mail.example.com.
> > dig +short @127.0.0.1 example.com. ns
note twice a query on NS of example.com
> # dig +short @127.0.0.1 example.com. ns
> server.example.com.
> # dig +short @127.0.0.1 mail.example.com.
> 9.1.1.18
> # dig +short @127.0.0.1 interlinx.bc.ca. ns
Hey, that one was not in the original post.
> server.example.ca.
> ns1.he.net.
> ns2.he.net.
> ns3.he.net.
> ns4.he.net.
> ns5.he.net.
Acknowledge.
Back to what the original problem is. (explain what
inconsistent use of a server=/example.com/<ip_addr> specification
is supposed to mean)
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Leven en laten leven
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list