[Dnsmasq-discuss] SRV record caching

Tue Jan 14 21:15:45 GMT 2020

Thank you for the link for the patch. Do I need to build it from source to
include the patch or can I install patch for dnsmasq instance that is
installed via apt ( i googled but could not find info on how to apply the
patch)

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:05 AM <
dnsmasq-discuss-request at lists.thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:

> Send Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list submissions to
>         dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         dnsmasq-discuss-request at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         dnsmasq-discuss-owner at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Dnsmasq-discuss digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Struggling with multiple nameservers (Geert Stappers)
>    2. Re: Struggling with multiple nameservers (Geert Stappers)
>    3. SRV record caching (Abhishek Patti)
>    4. Re: SRV record caching (Geert Stappers)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:03:44 +0100
> From: Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl>
> To: dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Struggling with multiple nameservers
> Message-ID: <20200113210344.gxkkjmsrpob2ps7e at gpm.stappers.nl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 10:20:40PM +0000, Harry Moyes wrote:
> > On 12/01/2020 15:40, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:33:43PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 04:37:32PM +0000, Harry Moyes wrote:
> > > > > >   ....
> > > > >
> > > > > I've already mentioned this to the developers.
> > > >
> > > > Any prove of that?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > The change is apparently intentional.
> > > > Assumed or documented?
> > > >
> > >
> > > My questions from above are indeed terse.
> > >
> > > Let me elaborate
> > > |> > I've already mentioned this to the developers.
> > > |>
> > > |> Any prove of that?
> > >
> > > That question was written in the hope of getting an URL or email
> > > where can be read what was mentioned to the pihole developers.
> > >
> > > I still hope such email or URL pops up. The idea is to ask,
> > > differently as previously, to regain the lost functionality.
> > >
> >
> > Unless it has gone missing somewhere I have already replied to the
> question.
> >
> > I misunderstood the response I got from the pihole-FTL developers.
> >
> > pihole-FTL -v does not respond as dnsmasq does. Intentionally.
> >
> > However if you submit the request as
> >
> > pihole-FTL -- -v
> >
> > you get exactly the same response as from dnsmasq including the compiled
> > options.
> >
> > The subtly of the extra "--" passed me by initially.
> >
> > As I said in my previous post, if I had understood the reply I got
> better,
> > I'd have saved myself a load of pain.
> >
> > Other than possibly making that subtlety more obvious to the slower on
> the
> > uptake among us, like me, there is nothing else required here.
>
> Acknowledge
>
>
> Regards
> Geert Stappers
> --
> Yes, the right question is real challenge
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:22:21 +0100
> From: Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl>
> To: dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Struggling with multiple nameservers
> Message-ID: <20200113212221.3tsyz5ozdxub4fkg at gpm.stappers.nl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 08:48:53PM +0100, Dominik wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 16:40 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:33:43PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 04:37:32PM +0000, Harry Moyes wrote:
> > > > > On 08/01/2020 14:47, wkitty42 at gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >  ...
> > > > >
> > > > > I've already mentioned this to the developers.
> > > >
> > > > Any prove of that?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > The change is apparently intentional.
> > > >
> > > > Assumed or documented?
> > > >
> > >
> > > My questions from above are indeed terse.
> > >
> > > Let me elaborate
> > > > > > I've already mentioned this to the developers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any prove of that?
> > >
> > > That question was written in the hope of getting an URL or email
> > > where can be read what was mentioned to the pihole developers.
> > >
> > > I still hope such email or URL pops up. The idea is to ask,
> > > differently as previously, to regain the lost functionality.
> > >
> > >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I may speak up as the main developer of Pi-hole's dnsmasq fork. We
> > embed dnsmasq into our daemon. The "dnsmasq -v" functionality is not
> > "gone", it just moved one step away as dnsmasq is only contained and
> > not the main application in our setup.
> >
> > So this statement is simply not true.
> > > The pihole derivative has lost that rather useful feature, so
> > exactly what options it has been complied with is hard to tell.
> >
> > Use
> > pihole-FTL -v
> > to get the version of our daemon.
> >
> > Use
> > pihole-FTL -- -v
> > to get the version of the embedded dnsmasq.
> >
> > I can already tell you that it will bring up
> > > Dnsmasq version pi-hole-2.80  Copyright (c) 2000-2018 Simon Kelley
> > > Compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-DBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP
> > >   DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack ipset auth DNSSEC loop-detect
> > >   inotify dumpfile
> >
> > This issue has been extensively discussed here as well:
> > https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/struggling-with-pihole-ftl/26473
> > and I have to admit that it's still not clear what was/is the error but
> > it looks like a user induced one. Also because the problem just
> > "disappeared" after some config changes that, apparently, cannot be
> > isolated any more.
>
> OK
>
>
> > I also already mentioned how to obtain the embedded dnsmasq's version
> > here on Jan 1st, 2020:
> >
> https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/struggling-with-pihole-ftl/26473/39?u=dl6er
> > which was one week before the original poster claimed that we removed
> > this intentionally ... interesting to see how perspectives can differ.
>
> Yes, perspectives differ.
> It becomes hard when the focal point isn't the same.
>
>
>
> Regards
> Geert Stappers
> --
> Leven en laten leven
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 20:17:00 -0800
> From: Abhishek Patti <abhishek.patti at gmail.com>
> To: dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] SRV record caching
> Message-ID:
>         <CAH=o+=2au89K2LESLfQriymO7qCU30O-9pwkHFQ4a53BdO=
> Wvw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi
>
> I see there is a recent (2019-01) patch enabling SRV record caching in
> dnsmasq,. However there seems to be no new version which contains this
> feature. I wanted to ask how people are working around this problem of not
> having SRV caching ? We are currently having major issues since we use SIP
> alot. Any help would be appreciated
>
> Thank You
> Abhishek Patti
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20200113/b0097110/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:06:24 +0100
> From: Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl>
> To: dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] SRV record caching
> Message-ID: <20200114060624.fhgpbi7thgfzv4dd at gpm.stappers.nl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 08:17:00PM -0800, Abhishek Patti wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I see there is a recent (2019-01) patch enabling SRV record caching in
> > dnsmasq.
>
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2019q1/012777.html
>
>
> > However there seems to be no new version which contains this
> > feature. I wanted to ask how people are working around this problem of
> not
> > having SRV caching ?
>
> > We are currently having major issues since we use SIP
> > alot. Any help would be appreciated
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss at lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Dnsmasq-discuss Digest, Vol 176, Issue 17
> ************************************************
>

-- 
abhishek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/attachments/20200114/1aa7b855/attachment.html>