[Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq using 100% of cpu
Geert Stappers
stappers at stappers.nl
Mon Mar 2 22:00:54 GMT 2020
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 08:32:49PM +0000, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
>
> On 17/02/2020 13:31, Donald Sharp wrote:
> > Running:
> >
> > sharpd at eva:~/dnsmasq$ /sbin/dnsmasq --version
> > Dnsmasq version 2.80 Copyright (c) 2000-2018 Simon Kelley
> > Compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt DBus i18n IDN DHCP DHCPv6 no-Lua
> > TFTP conntrack ipset auth DNSSEC loop-detect inotify dumpfile
> > ----
> >
> > When I install several hundred thousand routes into the kernel and
> > remove them( or some variation thereof ), dnsmasq eventually ends up
> > running 100% cpu:
> >
> > top - 18:45:18 up 1 day, 7:44, 1 user, load average: 2.70, 2.65, 2.34
> > Tasks: 424 total, 3 running, 421 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> > %Cpu(s): 12.1 us, 6.9 sy, 0.0 ni, 80.2 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.7 si,
> > 0.0 st
> > MiB Mem : 32131.3 total, 19483.6 free, 6620.3 used, 6027.4 buff/cache
> > MiB Swap: 32718.0 total, 31693.0 free, 1025.0 used. 24698.2 avail Mem
> >
> > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
> > COMMAND
> > 293183 nobody 20 0 11040 2040 1688 R 99.7 0.0 148:48.40
> > dnsmasq
> >
> > strace output:
> >
> > poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=5,
> > events=POLLIN}, {fd=6, events=POLLIN}, {fd=7, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8,
> > events=POLLIN}], 6, -1) = 1 ([{fd=4, revents=POLLERR}])
> > poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=5,
> > events=POLLIN}, {fd=6, events=POLLIN}, {fd=7, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8,
...
> > poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=5,
> > events=POLLIN}, {fd=6, events=POLLIN}, {fd=7, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8,
> > events=POLLIN}], 6, -1) = 1 ([{fd=4, revents=PO^Cstrace: Process 293183
> > detached
> >
> > I can pretty much make this happen at will. What can I provide to help
> > debug this?
>
> The first thing I'd like to know is what file descriptor 4 is, providing
> us with the first (say) 500 or 1000 lines of strace output would help
> with that.
>
>
> >
> > As a side note, I was not placing these routes into the default linux
> > routing table. Does dnsmasq need to be paying attention to these routes?
> >
>
>
> To save typing I've just pasted a comment from the code which explains
> why adding routes affects dnsmasq
>
> /* We arrange to receive netlink multicast messages whenever the
> network route is added.
> If this happens and we still have a DNS packet in the buffer,
> we re-send it.
> This helps on DoD links, where frequently the packet which
> triggers dialling is
> a DNS query, which then gets lost. By re-sending, we can avoid
> the lookup
> failing. */
>
>
> I suspect that the solution to this is to restrict the above to the
> "main" routing table.
>
Matching that with "[PATCH] Ignore routes in non-main tables"
( http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2020q1/013824.html )
Regards
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list