[Dnsmasq-discuss] v2.83 failed to send packet: Network is unreachable - roadmap?

[Simon Kelley]

On 24/01/2021 11:38, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 23.01.21 um 02:34 schrieb Lonnie Abelbeck:
>>> On Jan 22, 2021, at 4:33 PM, Simon Kelley <simon at thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> Apolgies about your wasted time. Once more with 2.84test3 ?
>> Thanks Simon, 2.84test3 solves all "failed to send packet" logs in my testing ...
>> --
>> Jan 22 18:44:22 gw-lan daemon.info dnsmasq[3297]: started, version 2.84test3 cachesize 4096
>> Jan 22 18:44:22 gw-lan daemon.info dnsmasq[3297]: compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-DBus no-UBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack ipset auth no-nettlehash no-DNSSEC loop-detect inotify no-dumpfile
> 
> So, I've updated FreeBSD's "head" branch to 2.83_1 which is essentially
> 2.84test3 (I just took the four patches from Git for now).
> 
> Simon, what's on the roadmap next, do we have an estimated schedule yet,
> or are there more regressions you are working on?
> 

There are no more regressions known.

I've just tagged 2.84rc1, from 2.83 this has commits as follows:

1) The three commits it took to fix the DNS regression.
2) A couple of tidying/optimisation to the new 2.83 security fixes that
were held back in the interests of keeping patchsets small for backporters.
3) Some administrivia.
4) Vladislav's HAVE_NETTLEHASH->HAVECRYPTOHASH change, but modified for
backward compatibilty with HAVE_NETTLEHASH.


I'm pretty confident of all of these, so unless I hear of a reason not
to, I intend to release this as 2.84 in 24 hours.


Cheers,

Simon.