[Dnsmasq-discuss] what is 'next-server' ? is it dhcp-option 66?
Geert Stappers
stappers at stappers.nl
Sat Jun 26 05:57:40 UTC 2021
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 09:55:01AM +0700, Bino Oetomo wrote:
> Dear All.
Hello,
> I have 3 Virtualbox guest.
> A. tftp-server DNSMASQ v.2.80 with IP address 10.10.254.1
> B. dhcp-server DNSMASQ v.280 with IP address 10.10.254.2 and 10.10.253.1 (This one facing IPXE client)
> C. IPXE client
<monospaced_font_required example_given="dnsmasq mailinglist archive">
+-----+ +-----+ +-----+
| | 10.10.254 | | 10.10.253 | |
| A +-------------------+ B +-------------------+ C |
| |.1 .2| |.1 .dhcp| |
+-----+ +-----+ +-----+
</monospaced_font_required>
> When I config dhcp server with:
> 'dhcp-boot=lpxelinux.0,server.name,10.10.254.1'
> IPXE client received 'next server' 10.10.254.1
>
> Next try, I commented 'dhcp-boot' line, and put
> dhcp-option=66,10.10.254.1
> dhcp-option=67,lpxelinux.0
>
> DNSMASQ log says:
>
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 next server: 10.10.253.1
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 sent size: 1 option: 53 message-type 5
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 sent size: 4 option: 54 server-identifier 10.10.253.1
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 sent size: 4 option: 51 lease-time 12h
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 sent size: 4 option: 58 T1 6h
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 sent size: 4 option: 59 T2 10h30m
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 sent size: 4 option: 1 netmask 255.255.255.0
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 sent size: 4 option: 28 broadcast 10.10.253.255
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 sent size: 4 option: 3 router 10.10.253.1
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 sent size: 12 option: 67 bootfile-name lpxelinux.0
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 sent size: 12 option: 66 tftp-server 10.10.254.1
>
> and the IPXE client receive 10.10.253.1, not as described by option:66
Come again, because I do see
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 next server: 10.10.253.1
> dnsmasq-dhcp: 3891074361 sent size: 12 option: 66 tftp-server 10.10.254.1
> Is 'next-server' different from dhcp-option-66?
Yes, they are two different "fields" in a DHCP network packet.
Regards
Geert Stappers
Did invest yesterday (in his timezone) a lot of time
in an interesting DHCPrelay related problem.
--
Silence is hard to parse
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list