[Dnsmasq-discuss] CS ART - dnsmasq bugs

Simon Kelley simon at thekelleys.org.uk
Wed Jul 21 22:20:38 UTC 2021


2.86test6 tagged.

Simon.


On 21/07/2021 21:15, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:20:14AM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
>> On 20/07/2021 10:26, Max Julian Hofmann via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
>>> Dear dnsmasq developers,
>>>
>>> the Advanced Research Team at CrowdStrike discovered multiple bugs
>>> affecting dnsmasq. The discovered flaws are estimated as low risk. I
>>> have attached a PDF file that contains the corresponding technical details.
>>>
>>> Please feel free to share the document among other developerts to fix
>>> the issues. Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for that. I just pushed fixes for all the issues, except a couple
>> which have been fortuitously fixed a couple of weeks ago. I think
>> everything is done now.
> 
> Quoting Petr Mensik (
>    https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q3/015275.html 
>    Fri Jul 9 12:10:23 UTC 2021
> )
>  
> 
> |Hi Simon,
> |
> |would you please tag another test version
> 
> 
> 
> And more complete quote
> 
> | | I have to say, I am very much liking the amount of testing that the new
> | | code is getting. It's great to find these regressions _before_ release.
> |
> |Hi Simon,
> |
> |would you please tag another test version after fixing build of dbus
> |builds? I tried building a test package for Fedora [1], but I would have
> |to backport dbus fixes. No recent test release works with dbus enabled,
> |which is required on Fedora.
> 
> 
> Regards
> Geert Stappers
> 
> [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pemensik/dnsmasq/build/2312608/
> 



More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list