[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Re: pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot
shrenik.bhura at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 07:06:49 UTC 2021
Thanks for all your help.
Have done a build from the fork shared above.
Herein are the test results.
Rpi + proxy success
Rpi + noproxy success
Efi + proxy failure
Efi + noproxy success
BIOS + proxy failure
BIOS + noproxy success
Earlier it was only:
Efi + noproxy failure
I believe that unless you can find a way to replicate all the scenarios at
your end, it will be very difficult for you to nail the exact problem area
in the code.
Hence, I have attached the pcap and logs for all scenarios as well as the
ipxe files and dnsmasq (proxy and noproxy) conf and build options used in
this archive -
The names of the files in the archive should be self-explanatory. Yet do
let me know if you need any further information.
On Thu, 7 Oct, 2021, 05:12 Petr Menšík, <pemensik at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I configured something on my laptop and tried few requests with my
> raspberry. I think I have found weird state. It checks only matching
> dhcp-range context, not pxe-service, when adding PXE stuff to requests.
> So I made it require also pxe-service. It seems it might do what you
> have requested, at least on the first glance.
> Patch #2 is just small tuning, unifying dhcp-boot and pxe-service way of
> setting boot files. There is slight chance it might break something. In
> that case, either dhcp-boot or pxe-service needs fixing.
> Could you please try success with patched version? I made new COPR
> builds  for Fedora, including these changes. But I think that is not
> your distribution. Can you try local build? Pushed also to our fork .
> 1. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pemensik/dnsmasq/
> 2. https://github.com/InfrastructureServices/dnsmasq/tree/pxe-services
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss