[Dnsmasq-discuss] address option doesn't work correctly if the target domain is a cname
Анна Тихомирова
vamp at vampik.ru
Mon Apr 18 15:20:58 UTC 2022
18.04.2022 16:38, Simon Kelley пишет:
> What's not obvious is what to do about it: In versions before 2.86,
> this wouldn't be a problem, because
>
> address=/api.ott.kinopoisk.ru/::
>
> would stop any queries for api.ott.kinopoisk.ru, including the IPv4
> query, being sent upstream. That means the an A query (or any other
> query) would return NODATA, and an AAAA query would return ::, which
> is all consistent.
Not quite true.
1) In versions before 2.86 I used the following syntax to achieve the
same behaviour:
server=/domain.com/#
address=/domain.com/::
This way AAAA query returned :: and A query was forwarded to upstream
servers (and this is exactly what I want - to block AAAA for specific
domains)
And this configuration had the same issue with CNAME. If domain.com is a
CNAME to someotherdomain.com, after making a query to
someotherdomain.com, queries to domain.com returns upstream AAAA record
instead of ::
2) Since 2.86 for some reason this config doesn't work:
server=/domain.com/#
address=/domain.com/::
The AAAA query return ::, but A query return NODATA, ignoring the server
directive.
3) But if I throw away server=/domain.com/# this works as expected -
AAAA query returns :: and A query is forwarded to upstream servers
address=/domain.com/::
Anyway, if you do any changes please do not break the possibility to
send :: AAAA for specific domains while forwarding A queries to upstream
servers.
filter-AAAA is not a solution because I want to prevent IPv6 resolution
only for specific domains.
More information about the Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list